Brutkey

Julian Fietkau
@julian@fietkau.social

@evan@cosocial.ca @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @andypiper@macaw.social 100% for setting up small servers. The Fediverse is almost certainly best off with lots of fairly small and fairly socially cohesive servers.

There is, however, a mismatch between the suggestion to set up a server and the audience of people who have heard about Mastodon somewhere and are willing to download an app to give it a shot. We're veering close to the β€œthe Fediverse is built for tech-savvy people” kind of elitism that I'm personally hoping we can grow out of.

Evan Prodromou
@evan@cosocial.ca

@julian@fietkau.social @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @andypiper@macaw.social I agree. I wonder if there's an onboarding flow that's like, "First, find out if you already have a server you can be a part of. Second, set up a server for a group you're in (either by hosting it yourself or getting one from a hosting provider). Lastly, try one of these..."


Fedi.Tips
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services

@evan@cosocial.ca @julian@fietkau.social @andypiper@macaw.social

I run a site at
https://growyourown.services to help and encourage non-technical people to create their own instances through managed hosting servers (which don't require any tech knowledge nowadays). It would be great if more people did this πŸ™‚πŸ™‚

But I'm not sure how this helps prevent centralisation caused by the "sign up with mastodon.social" button? By definition the people who click on that are the ones who don't click on "Pick another server".