Brutkey

Julian Fietkau
@julian@fietkau.social

@evan@cosocial.ca @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @andypiper@macaw.social 100% for setting up small servers. The Fediverse is almost certainly best off with lots of fairly small and fairly socially cohesive servers.

There is, however, a mismatch between the suggestion to set up a server and the audience of people who have heard about Mastodon somewhere and are willing to download an app to give it a shot. We're veering close to the “the Fediverse is built for tech-savvy people” kind of elitism that I'm personally hoping we can grow out of.

Evan Prodromou
@evan@cosocial.ca

@julian@fietkau.social @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @andypiper@macaw.social I agree. I wonder if there's an onboarding flow that's like, "First, find out if you already have a server you can be a part of. Second, set up a server for a group you're in (either by hosting it yourself or getting one from a hosting provider). Lastly, try one of these..."

Fedi.Tips
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services

@julian@fietkau.social @evan@cosocial.ca @andypiper@macaw.social

We need to give options for every kind of person who wants to join.

The option this thread is about is the kind of person who just wants to be told one server to sign up on, which is why the official apps and site currently say "sign up on mastodon.social".

All Masto gGmbH have to do is swap out mastodon.social and insert a server from a pool of reliable servers with equal or better track records.

That would then serve people who just want to be told one server.