Jan Wildeboer 😷
:krulorange:@jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
@giacomo@snac.tesio.it And now you are accusing me of having a hidden agenda? OK. For the sake of clarity, I have added the working definition for Digital Sovereignty I use in my blog post. It's from https://policyreview.info/concepts/digital-sovereignty
Giacomo Tesio@giacomo@snac.tesio.it
@jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
Where did I mentioned any "hidden agenda"?
Tbh, I don't even care if you have one. I was just commenting on your misguided overconplicated framework.
You tried to argue that actual digital sovereignty is impractical with a reduction to absurdum "in a pure paper based society".
Such a comparison is wrong on so many levels, and so obviously wrong, that it doesn't seem in good faith.
Also, the whole #OCT construction seems designed to blend the very concept digital sovereignty so that it doesn't exclude it's opposite, allowing digital #colonialism from #USA #BigTech to endure.
Obviously you might intend something completely different, but if the outcome of your resoning is compatible with any #BigTech to keep accessing data not generated in the #USA, it's in steer contraddiction with #DigitalSovereignty.
Unless, obviously, the whole world is just a US colony, as #Trump might in fact argue.