Brutkey

Fedi.Tips
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services

p.s. To avoid repetition of replies:

-If people forget name of server they signed up on, it's written on the email they received when they signed up.

-Mastodon.social is in no way more reliable or easier than other servers with similar or better track records.

-If Mastodon gGmbH does not trust anyone else to run a server properly, why should anyone else trust Mastodon gGmbH to run a server properly? "Trust me, but I won't trust you" is a terrible argument in a collaborative project.

Fedi.Tips
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services

p.p.s. Thanks for all the replies, they are interesting and thought-out but many seem to be addressing slightly different topics?

This particular problem of centralisation is being caused by a very specific thing: the "Sign up on mastodon.social" button on the official apps and official site.

If we want to stop this wave of centralisation, we need to focus on changing this button so that it no longer directs people to mastodon.social.

The Fediverse is unique and precious, let's not lose it.


xinit ☕☕ / 🗑🗑‍🔥🔥
@xinit@mastodon.coffee

@FediTips@social.growyourown.services
So long as it doesn't ONLY direct them to mastodon.social. Throw people to a round robin of moderately busy open systems.

Chris Lilley 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
@svgeesus@mastodon.scot

@FediTips@social.growyourown.services Totally, this should be a "help me choose a server" button.

haui :palestine_heart:
@haui@mastodon.giftedmc.com

@FediTips@social.growyourown.services
I might be wrong but wouldnt it be best if all instances held votes about the topic and presented mastodon social with the results?

Its just base democracy. They can of course disagree but it would set a sign.

Lynn I 🗽🗽 💙💙
@Lynn@mastodon.stickbear.me

@FediTips@social.growyourown.services Yes, I agree with you. This is why I closed my Mastodon Social account and will not sign up with a super large Mastodon instance again.