@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange
@UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org' has also brought up the idea of something similar to a "tutorial server" with limited functionality ... it's intriguing. one challenge is how to get enough interesting stuff there for people to decide it's worth exploring further. If it's just a tutorial that people have to go through to get to the next stage, then the risk is that unless folks are really really committed they're likely to lose interest.
@julian@fietkau.social @FediTips@social.growyourown.services
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services
@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange @UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org @julian@fietkau.social
"Rotating the default doesn't seem to me like it would address the :"good experience" aspect of the problem."
It's not about that at all, it's not about UI or UX.
The problem is about what happens to the network if it centralises. There are many important reasons why the Fediverse is decentralised: https://fedi.tips/why-is-the-fediverse-on-so-many-separate-servers/
All these reason get squashed if mastodon.social becomes over 50% of the network. The network would eventually "enshittify".