@watchfulcitizen@goingdark.social
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services Iβd say the approval flow is just bad UX all around.
Itβs not about users being lazy or entitled. The experience breaks momentum.
Youβve just discovered something new, youβre curious, you want to join, and suddenly youβre being asked to write a little essay for strangers. You donβt even know what kind of community it is yet or what they expect from you. Then you hit submit and the whole thing goes quiet. I donβt hate moderation, it's the uncertainty.
For new users I think itβs even worse.
Theyβve already had to pick a random server from a bunch of names that make no sense, read a page of rules that assume they already understand federation, and then theyβre told to justify why they want to join it.
Thatβs a huge ask for someone still trying to figure out what Mastodon even is. Itβs the same reason UX study's shows steep drop-offs with multi-step forms and unclear feedback. Users donβt finish what they donβt understand, and they donβt wait when they donβt know how long the wait is.
The design makes them feel like outsiders before theyβve even walked in the door. IMO I think a trial period would be a much better middle ground.
I opened a feature request about this exact issue yesterday that I think would solve the issues.
https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/36747
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services
@watchfulcitizen@goingdark.social
Thank you so much for taking time to write this, it's getting across well the experience someone would face if they've got no prior knowledge.