Brutkey

Magical Cat
@koteisaev@mastodon.online

@benroyce@mastodon.social @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @contrapunctus@en.osm.town
Fediverse have a solution to "asshole admin" - become an admin yourself. Of course it assumes you would got busy with moderation (pay with time) of own instance, or will need to pay some money for hosting, even if is some single-person instance. Or both.
But this is better than not having any solution to "asshole mod" problem we see across all centralized media/platforms.

Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
@benroyce@mastodon.social

@koteisaev@mastodon.online @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @contrapunctus@en.osm.town

in no way do i think centralized corporate social media is better in any way to the fediverse

but asshole mods defederating on pique is a problem


Magical Cat
@koteisaev@mastodon.online

@benroyce@mastodon.social @FediTips@social.growyourown.services @contrapunctus@en.osm.town
I agree that there is a risk of what I can call "feudal behavior" from instance admins.
But again, having at least the technical option to become admin of own instance and collect together people across these instances affected by the feud between these admins, is solution available via Fediverse out of the box.
It does not require a protocol update or a creation if new moderation mechanism, or defining any legally binding licensing or exams for admins.

Fedi.Tips
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services

@koteisaev@mastodon.online @benroyce@mastodon.social

Just to clarify my earlier post, I had totally misunderstood what Ben was saying. I think we're on the same side here.

I've edited my original reply to make this clear and remove the criticism.