Brutkey

JessπŸ‘ΎπŸ‘Ύ
@JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange

Spicy take: an advantage of centralized social media platforms is some degree of "Post Soverignty". Basically, OP controls their replies, which can be a really powerful tools to allow individuals to manage harassment and abuse or even just make an announcement and not hold a discussion.

I get that fediverse spec doesn't allow for it (at least in current implementations), but it sure would be nice to be able to unlink replies and only allow certain people/no people to reply.

Sometimes you just don't want to deal with trolls and replyguys and dunks.

Bill Statler
@billstatler@forum.statler.ws

Hi @JessπŸ‘ΎπŸ‘Ύ , ReplyGuy here. 😸😸 So what you're asking for is, if I reply to your post, my reply first goes to you, and then your settings determine whether it gets accepted and forwarded to the other participants in the thread. Do I understand that right?

Because (as @
rakoo and @Mike Macgirvin πŸ–₯πŸ–₯️ pointed out), that does exist already. If the Streams repository and Forte are too cutting-edge for you, check out Hubzilla. But you'll need Fediverse software that is designed around the "Post Soverignty" concept. Mastodon is not. As I understand it, this was a conscious design decision: the original poster and the commenters are all equal, and there is no way to retrofit Mastodon with "Post Soverignty".

But it's not a Fediverse spec problem.


Mike Macgirvin πŸ–₯πŸ–₯️
@mikedev@fediversity.site

@Bill Statler

FYI, @
Jesse Karmani is a fediverse developer and I think is probably looking for implementation details and specs rather than a pointer to other servers.

Bill Statler
@billstatler@forum.statler.ws

@Mike Macgirvin πŸ–₯πŸ–₯️ - Oops, my pre-comment due diligence did not pick up that @JessπŸ‘ΎπŸ‘Ύ and @Jesse Karmani were the same person. Sorry about that.

JessπŸ‘ΎπŸ‘Ύ
@JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange

@mikedev@fediversity.site @billstatler@forum.statler.ws https://infosec.exchange/@JessTheUnstill/115011747742796121