AI schadenfreude
@kevinrns@mstdn.social
'According to the groups, allowing copyright class actions in AI training cases will result in a future where copyright questions remain unresolved and the risk of "emboldened" claimants forcing enormous settlements will chill investments in AI.'
Oh, no! /snarky
@alcinnz@floss.social @kevinrns@mstdn.social so, why should #copyrightholders care about #AI-companies' bottomline?
I dont mean #copyright is perfect, I think the expirationdate is too damn long. But in contrast, if it cant even protect your work against becoming AI-trainingdatefood, what cΓ‘n it protect against?!
@feike@toot.community @kevinrns@mstdn.social Exactly!
I'm no fan of copyright (especially DRM), but when the powerful aren't playing by the same rules as the rest of us... That is injustice!
@alcinnz@floss.social @kevinrns@mstdn.social well I think #creators must be able to #profit from their work, like #Franquin could sell his #commicbooks #SpirouEtFantasio #GastonLagaffe . If there aint no #copyrightlaw anyone could copy his #creation, and he couldnt make or would have made less money from it.
But like #patentlaw, #copyright must expire sometime, and not like #disney's #MickeyMouse who's been protected from being #copied for #waltdisney's entire lifetime and 70 years afterwards (1/2)
@alcinnz@floss.social @kevinrns@mstdn.social (2/2) #patents expire at like 10 years and are ment for #inventions, while #copyright is ment for #thoughts and #ideas and can be eazier to profit from than inventions , cause you dont need to persuade buyers of your invention's effectiveness, your thoughts just need to be appealing. So, im arguing for a #copyrightexpirationdate set at maximum 25 years
@feike@toot.community @kevinrns@mstdn.social Yeah, I'd be happy with that!
Though I'd add that I'd like to see DRM stop being backed by laws & international treaties.
@alcinnz@floss.social @feike@toot.community
DRM is NOT copyright law. It is a kludge to enforce rich corporate power, using excuses from lawyers.
DRM is "fuck you" training to get you over "the customer is always right" expectations about corporations.
#drm #ai #fuckYouTraining
@kevinrns@mstdn.social @alcinnz@floss.social @feike@toot.community I'd go further: DRM is an infringement of copyright law. The legal basis of copyright is that it assigns monopoly protection for a fixed term, subject to fair use. DRM doesn't allow fair use or have a fixed term, therefore it breaks the fundamental legal agreement.
@mathew@universeodon.com @alcinnz@floss.social @feike@toot.community
Thank you for the clarification and expansion of the description of its transformation of the law. Copyright was a "right" - I wonder how many people even notice the spelling.
A handshake. A reward for creation, limited to guarantee quick addition of the creation to human progress.
Now through bribes and control of legislatures by money, it is applied as a weapon, with generations of control given to "rights purchasers" not content creators.
#copyright #ai #drm
@kevinrns@mstdn.social @alcinnz@floss.social @feike@toot.community Oh, yeah, that's another thing I dislike about copyright, that while the US constitution says "β¦securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventorsβ¦", what happens now is that corporations end up owning the copyright rather than the authors and inventors β again, defeating the purpose of its existence.