Brutkey

Ron Jeffries
@RonJeffries@mastodon.social

@GeePawHill@mastodon.social

That might not even be bad. As we both know, striving for excellence is its own reward, quite often its only reward.

But it is a reward. You know, as I do, the joy of making.

I suspect that that joy, and the joy of sharing, of once in a while sparking someone ... might be what it's all about.

Mediocre works. It has to work. It's a fundamental law of complex systems (that I just identified).

2/3

Chris Pitts
@thirstybear@agilodon.social

@RonJeffries@mastodon.social @GeePawHill@mastodon.social “Mediocre works” is, I suspect, an element of the truism “Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it gets”.

And if the results the system gets through mediocrity are good enough…boom
💥💥 Which is precisely the reason LLMs might just succeed in killling off software development-they might be “good enough” mediocre.

Which I find depressing as hell having strived to raise the bar and make a difference my entire career.


Poligofsky 🇨🇦🇨🇦
@8r3n7@mstdn.ca

@thirstybear@agilodon.social

If I may…

“Excellent” and “mediocre” are subjective and relative. They are aesthetic judgements, based on some set of preferred criteria. Otherwise, not disagreeing.

The reason that “mediocre” software—bloated, buggy, insecure—succeeds is that the competitive market landscape is characterized by winner-take-all. Upstarts get strangled in their cribs, if they are born at all.

The software ecosystem is not healthy. It has similarities to industrial agriculture.

@RonJeffries@mastodon.social @GeePawHill@mastodon.social