Brutkey

schuelermine
@anselmschueler@ieji.de
[Read post body for English translation] [Arzneimittel-Beipackzettel] Auswirkungen bei Fehlgebrauch Dopingzwecken Die Anwendung von Methylphenidat-ratiopharm kann bei Dopingkontrollen zu positiven Ergebnissen fΓΌhren. 8739fc001be971bc.jpg a complicated formula typeset in the LaTeX style the formula involves a root, inside of which, a part of the expression has a brace underneath it with a label, which has been stuck inside the root symbol and doesn’t protrude beyond it downwards inside that, there is a function being applied to a sum, with a noticeably larger-than-usual gap between the function name and the parentheses around the sum, which were scaled to match the vertical size of the sum symbol further inside the root, next to the underbrace-adorned part, another part of the formula, which is offset as to not overlap on any vertical line with the underbrace label, which is longer than the underbrace, even though it could easily fit between the root and the label the root has as its degree a product, which is typeset in scripts mode, i.e. the top and bottom limits of the product are placed on the right next to it and not above and below, but the limits are not at all smaller in font size than the rest of the root degree, and the whole root degree is way smaller than all other text, despite the large size of the root further, the degree has odd tracking (letter spacing), with letters appearing too far apart 8786eacae6b421d8.png the function calls f(1) and f(Ξ£) repeated twice, where Ξ£ is the sum symbol, larger than a typical symbol at the top, we can see that the parentheses scale to match the size of the sum symbol. however, in comparison to the bottom, where this is not the case, there is noticeably more space in between "f" and the parentheses 6009e897052a88b0.png C program is shown that prints the bytes of the BITINT_MAXWIDTH macro in a uintmax_t variable, and then prints the bytes of the number 1 in a uintmax_t variable, each in decimal and hex That program is compiled with GCC and then run, which shows BITINT_MAXWIDTH has a value of 65535 (hex 0xffff) b108a6ea63990f0a.png C program is shown that prints the bytes of the BITINT_MAXWIDTH macro in a uintmax_t variable, and then prints the bytes of the number 1 in a uintmax_t variable, each in decimal and hex That program is compiled with Clang and then run, which shows BITINT_MAXWIDTH has a value of 8388608 (hex 0x800000) 089ad8d99d1313a4.png Wikipedia chart Sentencing Table Effective Nov. 2012 (showing months of imprisonment) The X axis: "Criminal History Category (Criminal History Points)", from category I (0 or 1) to category VI (13+) The Y axis: Offense Level, with rows for each number 1 through 24 (rest of table not shown), with "Zone A", "Zone B", "Zone C" marked from 1–8, 9–11, 12–13 resp. The color of Zone A etc. extends out into the cells and recedes in a staircase pattern, i.e. higher Criminal History Categories leave e.g Zone B at lower Offense Level than lower categories Values in Zone A are all "0–6" (months) Values in Zone B range from "1–7" to "9–15" Values in Zone C range from "10–16" to "12–18" Values in the rest of the chart get progressively larger f9eedf75c657a480.png Court filing titled "Sentencing analysis" with a table of "Guidelines" that specify offense levels that should be totaled 2G2.2(a)(2) Base offense level, Offense Level 22 2G2.2(b)(2) Material involved a prepubescent minor or a minor who had not attained age of 12 years, Offense Level 2 2G2.2(b)(3)(F) Defendant knowing engaged in distribution, Offense Level 2 2G2.2(b)(4) Offense involves material that portrays sexual abuse or exploitation of an infant or toddler, Offense Level 4 2G2.2(b)(6) Offense involved the use of a computer or an interactive computer service for the possession, transmission, receipt or distribution of the material, or for accessing with intent to view the material, Offense Level 2 2G2.2(b)(7) Offense involved 600 or more images, Offense Level 5 b6762f37055a63fc.png 42aa75933ccddc56.mp3