Brutkey

Barry Schwartz 🫖
@chemoelectric@masto.ai

This is impossible if mathematics were consistent, so what physicists are claiming is that mathematics is inconsistent and therefore useless.

(Which they will deny, of course, but that is because they do not understand what they are doing. If they did, they would not do it.)

They are wrong.

So the proof here is that ANY mathematical method can be used to solve ANY supposedly ‘quantum’ word problem. Therefore there is nothing ‘quantum’ about the problem. It is an ordinary physics problem.

Barry Schwartz 🫖
@chemoelectric@masto.ai

With regard to the Aspect experiment, physicists both solve the problem incorrectly when they attempt to use probability theory (Bell and Clauser inequalities, all of which are botched mathematics), and run their experiments without actually checking them against the predictions of quantum mechanics. The results obtained by Aspect are impossible, according to quantum mechanics, but no one bothers to check. The experiments are fake.
Quantum physicists are the sloppiest ‘scientists’ in the world.▪️

Barry Schwartz 🫖
@chemoelectric@masto.ai

Footnote: The experiments are fake but probably by extremely strong experimenter bias rather than deliberate fraud.

Barry Schwartz 🫖
@chemoelectric@masto.ai

I think I shall both demonstrate converting the Aspect experiment to an equivalent one, AND show that mathematics actually IS consistent. I will do the latter by deriving the same correlation function as quantum mechanics does, even though physicists claim this can be derived only if you use quantum mechanics.

Which would mean using quantum mechanics gives a different answer than the rest of math, so math is internally inconsistent. Physicists claim nothing less.

Let’s to it

#physics #science