Brutkey

Niko (Martin) :heart_ace:
@martinligabue@tsukihi.me
Brian Greenberg :verified:
@brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

This Gmail hack is unsettling not because itโ€™s flashy, but because itโ€™s bureaucratic. Attackers arenโ€™t breaking encryption or outsmarting algorithms. Theyโ€™re filling out forms. By changing an accountโ€™s age and abusing Googleโ€™s Family Link feature, they can quietly reclassify an adult user as a โ€œchildโ€ and assume parental control. At that point, the rightful owner isnโ€™t hacked so much as administratively erased.

The clever part is that everything happens inside legitimate features. Passwords are changed. Two-factor settings are altered. Recovery options are overwritten. And when the user tries to get back in, Googleโ€™s automated systems see a supervised child account and do exactly what they were designed to do: say no.

Google says itโ€™s looking into the issue, which suggests this wasnโ€™t how the system was supposed to work. But itโ€™s a reminder of an old lesson. Security failures often happen when protective mechanisms are combined in ways no one quite imagined. The tools arenโ€™t broken. The assumptions are.

Thereโ€™s no dramatic fix here, only mildly annoying advice that suddenly feels urgent. Review recovery settings. Lock down account changes. Use passkeys. Because once an attacker controls the recovery layer, proving youโ€™re you can become surprisingly difficult.

TL;DR
๐Ÿง ๐Ÿง  Family safety tools are being weaponized
โšกโšก Account recovery can be shut down entirely
๐ŸŽ“๐ŸŽ“ Legitimate features enable the lockout
๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ” Prevention matters more than appeals

https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2025/12/07/google-looking-into-gmail-hack-locking-users-out-with-no-recovery

#Cybersecurity #Gmail #IdentitySecurity #AccountRecovery #DigitalRisk #security #privacy #cloud #infosec