Thread | Brutkey

@JorisMeys@mstdn.social @pjw@social.coop @carl@chaos.social @benroyce@mastodon.social @screwturn@mastodon.social @HamonWry@mastodon.world @Strandjunker@mstdn.social

Beyond that, seem to be number of issues to separate theoretical from practical:

Paper itself acknowledges that if the “idea of a [Manifest Normative Mandate] dictating whether a real world politician will act as a delegate or a trustee is naive” […] then the arguments that follow may rely on a problematic assumption”

Given readiness of candidates to go against likely wishes of their electors, I think this is a problem

@JorisMeys@mstdn.social @pjw@social.coop @carl@chaos.social @benroyce@mastodon.social @screwturn@mastodon.social @HamonWry@mastodon.world @Strandjunker@mstdn.social

Paper itself also acknowledges:

"abstaining from voting is only a move in one of those games […] It is not a move in the game that signals a voter’s preferred policies.”

@JorisMeys@mstdn.social @pjw@social.coop @carl@chaos.social @benroyce@mastodon.social @screwturn@mastodon.social @HamonWry@mastodon.world @Strandjunker@mstdn.social

More relevant still:

"The problem with voter abstention is that abstention may more strongly signal apathy than whatever message the
abstainer wants to send. As long as apathetic non-voters significantly outnumber ideological abstainers, the abstainers signal apathy by not voting.”

Given that 36% were non-voters in the last election, this seems to be the situation we're in.