Brutkey

John Carlos Baez
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

@MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz - in real analysis, the definition of 'Lebesgue integration' is incredibly important. This relies on the definition of Lebesgue integrable function f:ℝ→ℝ, and thence on the definition of measurable function, and thence on the definition of Lebesgue measurable set, and thence on the definition of Borel set. But for most analysts, integration is the main point of all those more fundamental definitions.

In functional analysis and quantum physics, I'd say the definition of 'Hilbert space' is incredibly important!

In algebraic geometry, I'd say the definitions of 'ample line bundle' and 'coherent sheaf' are incredibly important.

In homotopy theory, the definition of 'simplicial object' is incredibly important.

I'm picking definitions where it's not obvious right away why those definitions will turn out to be so central.

Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов
@vnikolov@ieji.de

@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz wrote:

In functional analysis and quantum physics, I'd say the definition of 'Hilbert space' is incredibly important!
Would you add "bounded operator" on par with it?

@MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz


John Carlos Baez
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

@vnikolov@ieji.de @MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz - I think the idea of 'bounded operator' is kind of obvious compared to the definition of 'Banach space', and in quantum mechanics the deep and important definition is that of 'self-adjoint operator', not necessarily bounded.

In short, I don't think 'bounded operator' is a concept with magical power, while 'Hilbert space' and 'self-adjoint operator' do have magical power.

Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов
@vnikolov@ieji.de

Thank you.
I made a mistake, I should have asked about "self-adjoint operator".

@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz @MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz