Weyoun 6@weyoun6@kolektiva.social
@carnage4life@mas.to @farlukar@mas.to @kjhealy@mastodon.social It demonstrates that ANN's do not "understand" anything. That doesn't mean they can't be useful tools, but they are not intelligent. Between the hype and the pushback to the hype, there is a lot of noise drowning out evaluations of the technology. There are some tasks it can do well, and on most it does poorly.
Van Sice@vansice@infosec.exchange
@weyoun6@kolektiva.social @carnage4life@mas.to @farlukar@mas.to @kjhealy@mastodon.social This thread is missing what AI _does._ It is a probability engine. That is how it works: it puts together the next most probable thing. It's not actually 'learning' anything. Books written with AI lack continuity for this very reason. If 6 fingered hands go away, it's only because this special case was addressed not to happen. Engineers learned. AI did not.