Thread | Brutkey

@dangoodin@infosec.exchange @EverydayMoggie@sfba.social

4. This entire article is framed around a single individual, and your argument is framed around a single retail location which maybe gets robbed all the time or maybe just doesn't restock frequently enough. Are these problems real? Of course. That's why I preemptively conceded that point in my reply. But Willie Horton was also a real, individual guy. So was Marinus van der Lubbe. Singular, extreme examples do not make good, broad-brush policy arguments.

Glyph
@glyph@mastodon.social

@dangoodin@infosec.exchange @EverydayMoggie@sfba.social Our system does have cracks in it, and the victims of folks like Neil Peck do not currently have an appropriate recourse to prevent his antisocial behavior from creating a persistent problem for them. It doesn't sound like he has a great life either; clearly the system is failing him, too. It's legitimate to discuss ways to handle edge-cases like this, and not to dismiss the concerns of e.g. the Target employees who have to confront him constantly.

Glyph
@glyph@mastodon.social

@dangoodin@infosec.exchange @EverydayMoggie@sfba.social But the assumptions that this article has, when you examine them, are ghoulish. Consider the phrase "catch and release". Like, yes, there need to be some constraints on his behavior to prevent constantly reoffending against the same victims. But if we diagnose the problem as "catch and release" then the implied solution is… catch and don't release? Throw him to rot in a hole for the rest of his life, with no possibility of escape, for stealing… $1000/mo from Target?