Brutkey

Patrick
@ppb1701@ppb.social

@AAKL@infosec.exchange @TechCrunch@mstdn.social @zackwhittaker@mastodon.social I call BS. If they designed it so that can happen, the designer/developers were idiots. Wouldn't you have notes/comments/analysis in a separate storage with just an association table link that. I feel like at most was they got a scrambled note link in the middle of it or off to the side. The main document should have been displayed regardless as long as the page itself was working IMO

AA
@AAKL@infosec.exchange

@ppb1701@ppb.social @TechCrunch@mstdn.social @zackwhittaker@mastodon.social I agree. This particular section, which Trump dislikes, is no laughing matter. Maybe they got caught red-handed? Where did I read today that there's an effort to make the digital versions the go-to for the constitution?

Patrick
@ppb1701@ppb.social

@AAKL@infosec.exchange @TechCrunch@mstdn.social @zackwhittaker@mastodon.social Well in theory.

If the original was lost or locked away. Then you could get into arguments on which is the "true version"

AA
@AAKL@infosec.exchange

@ppb1701@ppb.social @TechCrunch@mstdn.social @zackwhittaker@mastodon.social I don't even want to go there. There are hard copies around, some in private collections. But it's clear where all of this is going. The Project 2025 goons in the shadows have the Archives and every federal depository of knowledge under their thumb. And it's clear that they have no qualms about crushing any laws they don't like, such as inconvenient legal protections. I don't know who these people really are, but they are anything but American. and if one were to find an analogy, the vibes are those of an invasion.