Ghostrunner@ghostrunner@hachyderm.io
@kfogel@kfogel.org @QasimRashid@mastodon.social because it is not a coding error. in my 20 years in fintech crisis response, i have never seen an error like this. This is intentional.
Karl Fogel@kfogel@kfogel.org
@ghostrunner@hachyderm.io @QasimRashid@mastodon.social I've seen too many odd-to-impossible-looking errors in my career to be certain that this is intentional. However, I'm also not saying you're wrong -- it is, sadly, quite possible that this is a result of political interference.
For example, it might be that someone ordered the annotations or commentary on those articles to be changed (probably in some controversial and wrongheaded way, but that need have no technical significance), and in the course of making those section-specific updates the tech team accidentally brought down those sections... but then they stayed down because the content of the changes themselves are questionable and so no one's rushing to fix the problem? Or something?