@grimalkina@mastodon.social
@saraislet@infosec.exchange @mhoye@mastodon.social I don't read this argument as "investing in learning is counter to productivity" but more that "pushing for short term productivity without a supportive learning structure can negate the potential "productivity" benefits," no?
@saraislet@infosec.exchange
@grimalkina@mastodon.social @mhoye@mastodon.social
Oops, I meant to write "their conclusion is that NOT investing in learning undermines productivity benefits".
I've seen no scientifically well supported evidence that LLMs improve productivity outside of limited use cases (which is useful! but the magical thinking about LLMs is unbelievable)
At most organizations I've known, devs have supportive learning structures. They learn languages, tools, infrastructure, new concepts and practices, etc, regularly through their careers.
But usually devs do that because they see clear value to spending time learning a new language or tool, or even developing new tools that make our work more efficient or effective.