Brutkey

An excerpt from https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Name-Resolver/DNS

It reads:

"Traditional resolvers, including glibc’s, make use of multiple nameserver lines in resolv.conf by trying each one in sequence and falling to the next after one times out. musl’s resolver queries them all in parallel and accepts whichever response arrives first. This can increase network load (this is mitigated by only supporting up to three nameservers, and can be mitigated further at the configuration level by only configuring one nameserver) but drastically improves performance and reliability of DNS lookups, especially if diverse nameservers are used."
🏷🏷️ ID
ab6lwn39bnn261bg
πŸ“›πŸ“› Name
05336a15449d6653.png
πŸ“†πŸ“† Created At
2025-08-08T16:30:38.565Z
🐱🐱 Uploaded By
ab4nw229bnn236t6
πŸ’±πŸ’± Type
image/png
🌑🌑️ Size
0
⛓⛓️ MD5
2e4ce1bb3397c5170e390600f7ad54b2
πŸ“œπŸ“œ Alt Text / Comment
An excerpt from https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Name-Resolver/DNS It reads: "Traditional resolvers, including glibc’s, make use of multiple nameserver lines in resolv.conf by trying each one in sequence and falling to the next after one times out. musl’s resolver queries them all in parallel and accepts whichever response arrives first. This can increase network load (this is mitigated by only supporting up to three nameservers, and can be mitigated further at the configuration level by only configuring one nameserver) but drastically improves performance and reliability of DNS lookups, especially if diverse nameservers are used."
πŸ—’πŸ—’οΈ Attached To
/notes/ab6lv6ygbnn261bk