Brutkey

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
็พŽๅฐ‘ๅฅณๆˆฆๅฃซ Magica Octo dello Spacc โœจโœจโ˜•โ˜•
@femcessoctt

Zio yapperone, quanto cazzo odio l'IA nei motori di ricerca che racconta vere e proprie stronzate almeno metร  delle volte... ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ

Devo installare una app in Termux, e la fottuta papera mi dice di installare un pacchetto che NON ESISTE, e io lo so giร  che non esiste, perchรฉ ho controllato per sicurezza prima... e perchรฉ, se fosse cosรฌ semplice l'installazione, per quale razza di motivo io avrei dovuto fare la ricerca in primo luogo? Se ho cercato รจ perchรฉ ricordo che serve una procedura di merda mezza intricata (o, al minimo, scaricare degli eseguibili da qualche parte di esterno, che comunque aiutooo, che palle...); quasi piรน stupido dell'utente Termux medio, sto clanker.
Cioรจ, va bene pure sprecare risorse del pianeta per generare testo inutile e dannoso... ma almeno non fatemelo uscire sopra ai risultati veri e utili!!!
๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ’ฃ

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
luna the doggie :neofox_snug: :therian:
@lunareclipse@snug.moe

The thing to realize about Wayland is that noone is out to get you.

Most of the problems people have a knee jerk reaction about were either fixed in the past few years or are being actively worked on. Sometimes it takes a long time because people want to actually do it properly and not just do a quick hack, and that can involve some experimentation and failures before a good solution is settled on. Also creating standards that all major DEs and UI toolkits will agree on can be a challenge.

X11 was made in a time where you ran your software on a mainframe but ran the GUI on a separate computer, noone thought about security yet and hardware accelerated rendering wasn't a concern.
At this point it's a massive clusterfuck full of hacks that noone wants to maintain.
This is why Wayland exists, because people actually want to work on it, and they want to use the experience from the past to make something that works much better in the modern world, where your GUI apps run directly on your computer, want hardware acceleration, and you may want them to be sandboxed for security reasons.

There is XWayland for compatibility, with implementations ranging from being built into the compositor (KWin) to being a layer on top (xwayland-satellite).
I know at least one maintainer of a Wayland compositor that specifically only supports the latter approach because they don't want to deal with implementing any cursed X11 logic.

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡นIl nuovo report della Commissione UE demolisce il #ChatControl volontario, che vogliono rendere permanente:

"Dati insufficienti", alti tassi di errore e nessuna prova che porti a condanne.
๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ

Report:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0740

Il mio commento:
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-evaluation-report-eu-commission-again-fails-to-demonstrate-effectiveness-of-mass-surveillance-of-intimate-personal-photos-and-videos/

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บNew EU Commission report dismantles voluntary #ChatControl 1.0, which they now want to make permanent:

"Insufficient data", high error rates & no proof of actual convictions.
๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ

Report:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0740

My comment:
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-evaluation-report-eu-commission-again-fails-to-demonstrate-effectiveness-of-mass-surveillance-of-intimate-personal-photos-and-videos/

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
(RTP) Privacy & Tech Tips
@rtp_tips@tube.tchncs.de

ใ€AI Now Has Private Data / Regulation Bans / Online Identificationใ€‘
Banning AI regulation back with a vengence, sneaking into Defense Budget and executive orders. ALSO: Social Media For under 16yr olds may require ALL to identify themselves online. We also heard Oracle's Larry Ellison come out to say public internet data is no longer enough for AI training, it now needs all private data to meet its potential.

HOTTAKE: Do you think the aggressive efforts to enforce online identification on the internet may lead up to AI having more personally identified data, in order to enhance its trainiing?

When Larry Ellison says they already opened AI to private data, what kind of data are we talking about, and is there any exclusion?

Today's video shares this week's stories, and my personal thoughts / opinion on where we are headed.

Let's talk about it.

#AIregulation #privacyrevolution #cyber

SHARE YOUR THEORY / THOUGHTS IN COMMENTS

Join in the community. Your Comments, always appreciated (comments help push this content to more people).

EMAIL: righttoprivacy[at]i2pmail.org

(VIDEO SHARED EARLY ON PUBLIC BLOG:
http://righttoprivacy.i2p / https://bmc.link/politictech)

Watch, And Share With Others!

I create independent content to keep you informed, share unique tips (many times, completely original ideas, including not found elsewhere), and cover stories to keep you informed on the most pressing personal security / human rights privacy / open source topics.

If you learn something here, consider supporting below (sharing a video on social media is another great way to support this, motivating more time to new content)

๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ’Ž THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING SUPPORTING THIS CHANNEL

๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ’ป LAPTOP (more open Linux hardware): https://bmc.link/politictech/commissions (options)

๐Ÿช™๐Ÿช™ BITCOIN: bc1q44j0fjm2d4rp49l3wk6n6teshvztftl2qxuk44

MONERO:48qtspi5En44mJZLeiMoHYFEmuJfQYb5DLQxLDr7d1NXc53XaAvoT8PS3wBrhEc3VY1wxu5Rgw6oKBYgahpSAYnpHntbQNM

CASHAPP -
https://cash.app/$HumanRightsTech

MEMBERSHIP:
https://bmc.link/politictech/membership (early / exclusive / more)

SUPPORT OPTIONS (LIST):
https://bmc.link/politictech๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ’ป

*PUBLIC BLOG:*
https://bmc.link/politictech/posts

I2P HOSTED BLOG:
http://righttoprivacy.i2p

https://tube.tchncs.de/w/vAG1J7cQDgXSMKkAQ5HUS2

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
Leah Rowe ( #39c3 โ˜Žโ˜Ž๏ธFORKโ˜Žโ˜Ž๏ธ )
@libreleah@mas.to

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903

I signed this petition ages ago, and wrote to my MP. I got an email today, informing me that it will be debated in the UK parliament on 15 December 2025.

Specifically, the petition demands that the Online Safety Act be abolished.

I don't expect much will happen. The government seems pretty hell-bent on destroying the internet.

But hey, maybe hell will freeze over in the best way possible, and they start respecting civil liberties again. Crazier things have happened.

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno
TheEvilSkeleton ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ
@TheEvilSkeleton@social.treehouse.systems

The importance of appropriately putting emphasis on a subject avoids misplacing blame towards groups that have no control over a given situation. For example:

"Wayland has a lot of compatibility issues with XYZ"

This makes Wayland the subject of the sentence, and thus puts emphasis on Wayland. This implies that Wayland is the culprit, and thus the blame is misplaced on Wayland.

Wayland has existed for over a decade. Several entities with a large amount of customers have actively sabotaged Wayland development by the lack of involvement, including and especially NVIDIA. Sure, these companies are now involved with the ecosystem, but for the longest time they have refused to properly support Wayland, worked
against Wayland by implementing their own "solutions", or by doing absolutely nothing, which slowed down progress for so many years.

So the proper way to phrase this is "XYZ has a lot of compatibility issues with Wayland". This makes XYZ the subject and thus puts emphasis on that, rather than Wayland.

This is very similar to putting emphasis on Linux when making a statement about hardware compatibility: "Linux doesn't work well with XYZ" โ€” no, likely XYZ doesn't work well with Linux, not the other way around. Most of the time, the hardware is the one at fault for not properly supporting the Linux drivers.

Gianmarco Gargiulo
@gianmarcogg03@mastodon.uno